At the core of the
debate between scientism and religion is the disagreement as to the nature of
matter, life and consciousness.
For example – as you
know– each would have an entirely different way of answering the question
which is emblematic of the debate: "What is the nature of the force that
governs and drives 'natural selection'?"
Were we to take a more
integrated and multidisciplinary approach to understanding life we may have a
more comprehensive, and intellectually satisfying, explanation of the questions
of how we got here, and how we solve the world's greatest challenges.
One of my favorite
ideas is consilience – the convergence of many
disciplines into a more comprehensive understanding of reality. Here's a link to a book
named "Consilience" which is a favorite of mine.
For those curious about these ideas, there's a number of items which are not
usually brought to mind in the conversation between "Creationism" and
"Evolution"
Alternatively - Wendell Berry is an outspoken critic of E.O.
Wilson's book – in his book "Life is a Miracle"